Thousands cries were heard in recent days about the proposal to create a single service Storage of land and maritime borders of the EU, but the reality is quite the image formed in public debate, especially in Greece.
The hard data is implacable:
• The proposal does not envisage sending forces with other European decision if the Member State so wishes.
Conversely, if a Member State does not help wishing, the only weapon the other is the infringement procedure (ie the court and fines 2 and 3 years after the "infringement" of the Member State). The intervention of a foreign power against the will of a sovereign state called the invasion and it is obvious that the European Commission's legal service knew this, but not those who were shouting.
• The infringement procedure is not "exit of the country from the Schengen"
The management board will propose measures, if these measures are not taken, it will request the deployment of forces of the new service. If you do not accept the aid and border protection of that State is incomplete then the other Member States apparently to reintroduce border controls with non-cooperating state, based on the Articles of the Treaty.
But if a state does not control its borders and does not accept help, then obviously malicious functions, so the isolation within the EU, it has other consequences. But no one imagines why a government would want to operate that way.
• The task forces will operate under control, command and coordination of national authorities, after the training operational plan
By the way it is structured, the proposal is very likely that a Member State is put in front of a problematic situation at its border to ask 1500 people by the Member States to enhance this already done, but to close the doors, just as Every summer, the Greek authorities require firefighters and vehicles for forests.
For example, responsible for guarding the border with Macedonia can have at any time in the service of 1500 people, just as would happen if the same request could be answered from Athens and not Brussels.
• From that 1500 will come?
The national counterparts border guard. Every state with external Schengen borders will contribute 2% of border guards of any state without external Schengen borders 3%. These people should be able to gather in three days and are in the area with the problem.
• The new service will be fingerprinted, to capture and organize the return of immigrants?
Just what are some of the tasks of the national authorities who can not make ends meet. The service will analyze in advance the possibility of a accumulation of refugees in that border and has warned the Member State.
The Member State will have the opportunity to prepare for the risk alone, he may request the help of the service and generally reduce the cost and administrative fatigue from taking over entirely the same action.
• It is a precursor to joint patrols in the Aegean with the Turks?
Not even close. In the hypothetical case used in the Aegean, the service will patrol the Greek coast guard and tries to Greek islands. It is obliged to accept as the border that indicates the operational plan of the Greek authorities and what it accepts as borders the Greek state and the Accession Treaty to the EU.
So contrary to the logic of "gray zones", the EU will have to take a stand in favor of Greece, facilitating perhaps the way to reference the only real difference with Turkey (the continental shelf in the Hague court).
• What stays from now?
At present there is only the Frontex, which is far past is today. The 28 will discuss the proposal at the summit, according to its wording Tusk leaders.
Member States will eventually come up with a plan (Intergovernmental Convention, as with so many other organizations from 2008 onwards), they will adopt the new service will be ready for action barring unforeseen spring.
The hard data is implacable:
• The proposal does not envisage sending forces with other European decision if the Member State so wishes.
Conversely, if a Member State does not help wishing, the only weapon the other is the infringement procedure (ie the court and fines 2 and 3 years after the "infringement" of the Member State). The intervention of a foreign power against the will of a sovereign state called the invasion and it is obvious that the European Commission's legal service knew this, but not those who were shouting.
• The infringement procedure is not "exit of the country from the Schengen"
The management board will propose measures, if these measures are not taken, it will request the deployment of forces of the new service. If you do not accept the aid and border protection of that State is incomplete then the other Member States apparently to reintroduce border controls with non-cooperating state, based on the Articles of the Treaty.
But if a state does not control its borders and does not accept help, then obviously malicious functions, so the isolation within the EU, it has other consequences. But no one imagines why a government would want to operate that way.
• The task forces will operate under control, command and coordination of national authorities, after the training operational plan
By the way it is structured, the proposal is very likely that a Member State is put in front of a problematic situation at its border to ask 1500 people by the Member States to enhance this already done, but to close the doors, just as Every summer, the Greek authorities require firefighters and vehicles for forests.
For example, responsible for guarding the border with Macedonia can have at any time in the service of 1500 people, just as would happen if the same request could be answered from Athens and not Brussels.
• From that 1500 will come?
The national counterparts border guard. Every state with external Schengen borders will contribute 2% of border guards of any state without external Schengen borders 3%. These people should be able to gather in three days and are in the area with the problem.
• The new service will be fingerprinted, to capture and organize the return of immigrants?
Just what are some of the tasks of the national authorities who can not make ends meet. The service will analyze in advance the possibility of a accumulation of refugees in that border and has warned the Member State.
The Member State will have the opportunity to prepare for the risk alone, he may request the help of the service and generally reduce the cost and administrative fatigue from taking over entirely the same action.
• It is a precursor to joint patrols in the Aegean with the Turks?
Not even close. In the hypothetical case used in the Aegean, the service will patrol the Greek coast guard and tries to Greek islands. It is obliged to accept as the border that indicates the operational plan of the Greek authorities and what it accepts as borders the Greek state and the Accession Treaty to the EU.
So contrary to the logic of "gray zones", the EU will have to take a stand in favor of Greece, facilitating perhaps the way to reference the only real difference with Turkey (the continental shelf in the Hague court).
• What stays from now?
At present there is only the Frontex, which is far past is today. The 28 will discuss the proposal at the summit, according to its wording Tusk leaders.
Member States will eventually come up with a plan (Intergovernmental Convention, as with so many other organizations from 2008 onwards), they will adopt the new service will be ready for action barring unforeseen spring.
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου