Shock to the judicial victory of the "bane" of Norway
Reflection caused by the judicial victory of the "bane" of Norway, Anders Breivik, who won the case against the state for violation of human rights.
The court ruled that the state of Norway violated human rights of Anders Behring Breivik exposing him to inhuman, degrading treatment or punishment during the serving of the prison sentence that has been imposed.
Breivik, who killed 77 people in two attacks carried out in 2011 and which were the worst acts of violence that have occurred in Norway since the Second World War, appealed in March to the court against the Norwegian authorities accusing it violated the European Convention human Rights because they keep him isolated from other prisoners.
In its verdict the court stated that the Norwegian State violated Article 3 of the European Convention.
"The prohibition of inhuman and degrading treatment represents a fundamental value in a democratic society. This applies in any case - and in the treatment of terrorists and killers "in its decision the judge Ellen Antenaes Sekulic.
The decision also stated that the Norwegian State did not violate the right of Breivik has private and family life.
In March, the case had caused consternation and a few laughs among Norwegians who had been surprised by the complaints of Breivik that coffee he served cold and meals warmed in a microwave oven, things called "worse than torture waterboarding '.
Before the verdict, the lawyers of both sides had said it would appeal if the decision is not in their favor.
Reflection caused by the judicial victory of the "bane" of Norway, Anders Breivik, who won the case against the state for violation of human rights.
The court ruled that the state of Norway violated human rights of Anders Behring Breivik exposing him to inhuman, degrading treatment or punishment during the serving of the prison sentence that has been imposed.
Breivik, who killed 77 people in two attacks carried out in 2011 and which were the worst acts of violence that have occurred in Norway since the Second World War, appealed in March to the court against the Norwegian authorities accusing it violated the European Convention human Rights because they keep him isolated from other prisoners.
In its verdict the court stated that the Norwegian State violated Article 3 of the European Convention.
"The prohibition of inhuman and degrading treatment represents a fundamental value in a democratic society. This applies in any case - and in the treatment of terrorists and killers "in its decision the judge Ellen Antenaes Sekulic.
The decision also stated that the Norwegian State did not violate the right of Breivik has private and family life.
In March, the case had caused consternation and a few laughs among Norwegians who had been surprised by the complaints of Breivik that coffee he served cold and meals warmed in a microwave oven, things called "worse than torture waterboarding '.
Before the verdict, the lawyers of both sides had said it would appeal if the decision is not in their favor.
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου